What is the Econd®?


The Econd®: Revolutionising State of Nature Measurement.

The Econd®, short for "Environmental Condition Index," stands as the pioneering cornerstone of the Accounting for Nature® Framework. What sets this innovative metric apart is its ability to simplify complex and intricate scientific information into a single number. By providing a streamlined and easy-to-understand measure that anyone can comprehend, the Econd® makes environmental condition reporting more accessible and meaningful for a broader audience.

The Econd® is the core metric in the Accounting for Nature® Framework. Think of the Econd® as a score that condenses complex scientific information into a single number ranging from 0 to 100. In this scale, 100 signifies the optimal or best possible condition of an Environmental Asset, akin to its pristine, untouched state, such as a well-preserved old-growth forest. This ideal state is referred to as the 'Reference Condition Benchmark' or simply the Reference Benchmark.

Conversely, an Econd® of 0 signals that the Environmental Asset is completely degraded, dysfunctional, or no longer in existence, like a cleared field.

The Econd® serves as a straightforward measure to gauge the overall health and state of an Environmental Asset, making it easier to understand and interpret. Behind this simplicity, however, lies a robust methodology, designed to uphold scientific integrity and accuracy.

The science behind the Econd®.

Unveiling the Method Behind the Simplicity.

The Econd® appears as a simple score, but it's the result of a meticulous process guided by an Accounting for Nature® Accredited Method. This Method serves as a blueprint, outlining a set of measurable and scientifically robust indicators. When aggregated, these indicators form the basis of the Econd®, offering a comprehensive representation of the Condition of a specific Environmental Asset.

Understanding the Econd®.

The Econd® index, exclusive to the Accounting for Nature® Framework, is a powerful tool that simplifies the understanding, comparison, and communication of diverse Environmental Assets across different locations, times, and scales. What makes it truly unique is its accessibility, enabling people with limited scientific experience to engage with and interpret the information it provides.

Monitoring the condition of a specific Environmental Asset becomes effortless with the Econd®. Changes in the Econd® over time serve as a reliable gauge, revealing whether the asset is improving, deteriorating, or maintaining condition. This dynamic metric offers credible evidence to support various nature-related claims and disclosures, providing valuable insights into the state of the environment.

When interpreting an Econd®, consider these five key factors:

  1. Environmental Asset: Identify the type of asset represented by the Econd® score, such as soil or a forest.

  2. Accuracy: Assess the precision of the Econd® score, expressed as very high, high or moderate, and supported with a percentage (e.g., 95%, 90% or 80%).

  3. Scale: Understand the size of the Environmental Account and the corresponding land or sea area covered by the Econd®. It could represent a project, property, or a larger region.

  4. Reporting Period: Take note of the timeframe the Econd® represents, whether it's a calendar year, financial year, or another specified period.

  5. Condition Target: If applicable, consider the Condition Target of the Econd®. For instance, a statement like "through restoration, the current Econd® of 25 is expected to rise to 50 within the next 5 years" provides a context for the current score and future expectations.

By keeping these considerations in mind, you can unlock a deeper understanding of the Econd® and harness its insights to make informed decisions about the environmental well-being of specific assets.

Econd® - 5 key factors.

  • The Environmental Asset

    The Econd® is calculated for a specific Environmental Asset.

  • Accuracy

    The Accuracy Level of the Econd® represents the expected precision, offering insights into error margins and change detection ability between reporting periods.

  • Scale

    The Scale provides important context for the Econd® by describing the type of area that the Environmental Account represents.

  • Reporting Period

    The Reporting Period describes the years in which data was collected to underpin the Econd®.

  • Condition Target

    Condition Targets provide context to the measured Econd®, representing the realistically attainable condition for an Environmental Asset, often below 100.

The Environmental Asset.

An Environmental Asset, in the context of the Econd®, refers to any element of nature found in land, ocean, or freshwater or the transitional areas between them (land/ocean, freshwater/ocean, land/freshwater). These assets can range from specific entities like an individual fauna species or a river to broader categories like a taxonomic group (e.g., birds or mammals) or a vegetation community. They can even represent entire ecosystems, such as the waterways within a catchment.

To simplify communication, Accounting for Nature classifies Environmental Assets into six distinct categories or Environmental Asset Classes:

  1. Vegetation

  2. Soil & Sediment

  3. Water

  4. Fauna

  5. Ecosystems

  6. Microorganisms

This categorisation helps streamline the understanding and communication of diverse elements in nature, making it easier to present and interpret Econd® scores for a wide range of Environmental Assets. Whether you're dealing with a specific species, a broader taxonomic group, or an entire ecosystem, the Econd® provides a comprehensive and accessible way to gauge and communicate the condition of our environment.

Accuracy.

The Econd® can be calculated at one of three Accuracy Levels: Very High (95%), High (90%), or Moderate (80%), determined by the Accounting for Nature® Accredited Method applied. These levels indicate how closely the measured Econd® represents the true condition of the Environmental Asset. Learn more in Accounting for Nature® Method Rules.

Econd® Reporting: Whole Numbers vs. Decimals

When reporting the Econd®, there is the option to present it as a whole number or with one decimal. Importantly, neither method holds an inherent advantage in terms of accuracy. Econd® scores are invariably associated with specific Accuracy Levels, meaning identical error margins and change detection thresholds apply, irrespective of whether they are reported as a whole number or with a decimal.

Whether a user opts for a whole number or includes a decimal, the key is maintaining consistency throughout the Environmental Account's lifespan. This uniformity ensures clarity and facilitates a seamless interpretation of Econd® scores over time.

Scale.

Environmental Accounts fall into distinct Scale categories, outlining the spatial area they cover:

  1. Project Scale: Encompassing a specific area managed for a designated project or outcome (e.g., carbon sequestration or restoration).

  2. Property Scale: Covering an entire property defined by legal boundaries (e.g., Lot/Cadastral Boundaries in Australia), which may consist of one or multiple land uses.

  3. Regional Scale: Spanning a continuous geographical area larger than individual towns or cities but smaller than state/provincial, national, or continental contexts. Defined by specific geographical, ecological, socio-political, or administrative boundaries, and typically owned and managed by various entities. Examples include local government areas, catchments, biogeographic regions, and sub-national jurisdictions.

  4. Aggregate Scale: Encompassing multiple projects and/or properties or spanning across multiple regions, an Aggregate-scale Environmental Account consolidates diverse environmental efforts into a single comprehensive account.

Reporting period.

A Reporting Period signifies the timeframe, typically 12 months (though it may extend over several years), during which data is gathered to underpin the Econd®.

While most Econd® scores convey the condition of an Environmental Asset at a specific point in time, often denoted as a year, certain Methods permit the calculation of a single Econd® over multiple years. This approach is commonly chosen for Asset Accounts covering expansive areas, where numerous samples may be impractical to collect within a single season of a single year.

Once a Reporting Period is selected for an Asset Account, it remains consistent for the account's lifespan, ensuring uniformity in result interpretation. This practice maintains reliability and facilitates a reliable comparison of results over time.

Condition target.

In an Asset Account, Condition Targets, often expressed as a target Econd®, may be incorporated to articulate the envisioned or preferred Econd®.

These targets offer valuable context to the measured Econd®, representing a realistically achievable condition for the respective Environmental Asset. It's important to note that Condition Targets are often set below 100, providing a practical target that aligns with the achievable state for the asset.